In the dynamic world of technology, businesses are constantly innovating their architectural approaches. One of the most sought-after trends in recent years has been the transformation from monolithic architecture to microservices. This paradigm shift allows companies to scale more efficiently, deploy changes faster, and adapt to fast-paced market demands. This article describes what are the pitfalls of monolith and how a product can be turned into microservices using Domain Driven Design (DDD) strategy.
Monolithic Design and its Pitfalls
A software or an application that has all the necessary modules and components bundled into a single deployable unit of execution is known as a monolithic application. Usually, such an application has a single codebase and runtime. The features of this application are tightly coupled and interconnected. The deployment of a monolithic application is quite simple. In the early stages of application development or when creating an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) or POC (Proof of Concept), this design offers one of the fastest and most efficient approaches. Unfortunately, this easy approach has many drawbacks. Applications that gradually gain success and experience growing user traffic tend to expand in size. Over time, they begin to show signs of complexity, making management increasingly challenging. Eventually, the centralized design can hinder development, debugging, and scaling efforts.
Microservices at the Rescue
A microservice, as the name suggests, is an independent, modular, and loosely coupled component of a larger software application architecture. Each microservice is focused and responsible for specific business requirements. These services persist their own data and interact with other services using REST API (Representational State Transfer Application Programming Interface) or gRPC (Google Remote Procedure Calls) calls.
This type of architecture opens the possibility of implementing the codebase in various programming languages, frameworks, tech stack, and database technologies. Since each microservice is distinct from others, its deployment is also independent. Based on user needs and demands, the service can evolve and scale. Due to lean structure, development and deployment cycle become quicker and new features can be released to customer faster. The major advantage of microservice architecture is that it doesn’t have a single point of failure.
Seeing these advantages, it’s better to move the monolithic application to newer and proven microservice architecture. It takes a lot of effort and time to migrate a monolith to a microservice and prevent errors or overruns. The migration strategy should enable the team to refactor the application without disrupting business continuity. One effective approach is Domain Driven Design (DDD).
Domain Driven Design (DDD)
Domain Driven Design (DDD) is a collaborative and strategic approach to software development. DDD aligns technical implementation with business goals by identifying and defining bounded contexts for microservices. This approach enables a shared understanding between development teams and domain experts, establishing a united and effective development process.
One of the important aspects of microservice architecture is to decide the boundaries of individual services. The goal of a microservice is to perform specific operations without interfering with the functionality of other microservices. This is where designing microservices around domains and business capabilities becomes essential.
Each microservice should have an abstract layer for the consumer and end-users hiding the domain knowledge and operations. For example, a customer using a food delivery app should be able to place an order without needing to know how the delivery partner is assigned to that order.
Migration Using DDD Strategy
DDD offers a methodology that helps you to modernize monolithic apps to a collection of well-designed microservices. DDD also makes sure that the application structure remains stuck to business capabilities. The migration involves four steps as mentioned below:
1. Analyzing the business domain
It’s important to conduct an in-depth study of the business domain that the application serves before moving on with the technical implementation. Understanding the user workflows, business procedures, and essential functional requirements are all necessary for this study. The developers can find important concepts, relationships, and behaviors to be modelled in the software by acquiring insights into the domain.
The study results in an informal outline of the domain, which forms the basis for the subsequent development of a formal domain model, establishing a foundation for further refinement and implementation. This preliminary interpretation guarantees that the finalized application closely corresponds with the business requirements, laying the groundwork for an effective rollout.
2. Defining bounded context
The bounded contexts define discrete subdomains contained within the larger business domain. These contexts encapsulate their individual domain models by drawing distinct borders around collections of related concepts. The developers can ensure that terms and concepts have unambiguous meanings within their own contexts and manage complexity by designing restricted contexts.
The teams are able to work autonomously and modularly on different parts of the application without hindrance when working in bounded environments. This structured approach enables the creation of cohesive, maintainable software by focusing on smaller, manageable segments of the domain.
3. Applying DDD patterns
The developers use DDD patterns within each bounded context to identify important architectural components and improve the domain model. These patterns include entities representing business objects with unique identities and lifecycles, as well as aggregates that encapsulate and enforce consistency within clusters of related entities.
Additionally, domain services are designed to contain domain logic that isn’t intrinsically associated with any single entity or value object. By applying these patterns, the developers establish a coherent and cohesive structure for modeling and implementing the business domain within each bounded context. Fostering domain-driven design concepts like cohesion, encapsulation, and domain-centric thinking, leads to software architectures that are more resilient and manageable.
4. Identifying Microservices
The next step is finding the microservices within the application architecture, once the domain has been examined, bounded contexts established, and domain models developed. Microservices are identified based on the boundaries set by bounded contexts, with each microservice responsible for implementing the functionality of a specific context. By aligning microservices with bounded contexts, teams can ensure that each service is focused on a well-defined area of the domain, minimizing dependencies, and maximizing autonomy. This method can help create modular, independently deployable components that can be updated, scaled, and maintained more quickly. Overall, the teams can design and develop resilient and adaptive applications that can closely match the business needs, thanks to the discovery of microservices based on domain-driven design principles.
Case Study
The case study of Acme Inc., a fictional company, illustrates how migrating from a monolithic architecture to microservices can overcome common challenges.
1. Introduction
- Company Overview
Acme Inc. is a global leader in technology solutions, providing innovative products and services to customers worldwide.
- Problem Statement
Acme Inc. faced challenges with their monolithic architecture, including slow-release cycles, tight coupling between components, and difficulty in scaling and maintaining the system.
2. Background
- Industry Context
The technology industry is rapidly evolving, demanding agility, scalability, and innovation from companies like Acme Inc.
- Challenges
Acme Inc. recognized the limitations of their monolithic architecture in meeting the demands of a dynamic market, hindering their ability to innovate and scale effectively.
3. Problem Statement
Acme Inc. identified their monolithic architecture as a bottleneck to agility, scalability, and innovation. Challenges included: long deployment cycles, high coupling between components, and challenges in adopting emerging technologies.
4. Solution
- Transition to Microservices
Acme Inc. embarked on a journey to transition from a monolithic architecture to a microservices-based architecture.
- Adoption of Domain-Driven Design (DDD)
To guide the decomposition of the monolith, Acme Inc. embraced the DDD principles.
- Strategic Approach
The transition was approached incrementally, focusing on identifying bounded contexts within the domain and defining clear service boundaries.
5. Implementation
- Identifying Bounded Contexts
Acme Inc.’s engineering teams collaborated closely with domain experts to identify distinct bounded contexts within their technology landscape.
- Defining Service Boundaries
Each bounded context was mapped to a microservice, encapsulating related domain logic and data.
- Decomposition
The monolithic application was decomposed into a set of loosely coupled microservices, each responsible for a specific domain function.
- Infrastructure Modernization:
Acme Inc. invested in modern infrastructure tools and platforms to support the microservices architecture, including containerization and orchestration technologies.
6. Results
- Improved Agility
The transition to microservices empowered development teams at Acme Inc. to release features independently, resulting in faster time-to-market.
- Scalability
With microservices, Acme Inc. could scale individual components based on demand, improving system resilience and performance.
- Flexibility
The modular nature of microservices allowed for easier adoption of new technologies and frameworks, enabling rapid innovation.
- Enhanced Developer Experience:
Teams enjoyed greater autonomy, ownership, and accountability over their respective microservices, fostering a culture of innovation and collaboration.
Conclusion
The transition from monolithic architecture to microservices, guided by Domain-Driven Design (DDD) principles, allowed Acme Inc. to overcome significant challenges related to scalability, agility, and innovation. By adopting microservices and DDD, Acme Inc. has positioned itself to meet the demands of a dynamic technology landscape, enabling faster time-to-market, improved system resilience, and greater flexibility for continuous growth and innovation.
Know More: Cloud Services
Authors